Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r_api".
Did you mean:
r_apt
2024 Apr 25
1
[External] Re: Is ALTREP "non-API"?
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:31:39 -0500 (CDT)
luke-tierney--- via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
> We would be better off (in my view, not necessarily shared by others
> in R-core) if we could get to a point where:
>
> all entry points listed in installed header files can be used in
> packages, at least with some caveats;
>
> the caveats are
2024 Apr 25
1
[External] Re: Is ALTREP "non-API"?
...truth" for what is in the API, and
could be seen at a glance by browsing / grepping the installed R
headers. I see this as a structured way of accomplishing what is
already being done to clarify whether functions are part of the API in
the R headers.
A similar approach would have macros like R_API, or with a bit more
specificity, maybe something like R_API(ALTREP), which would have no
actual definition -- they would exist in the source purely to mark
functions as part of (some subset of) the API. Or, similarly, anything
declared within a block like R_API {} would be considered part of the
AP...