Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r_0x10f300".
Did you mean:
0x10f300
2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 02/11] nvkm/ramgf100: Calculate timings
...100.c
@@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ struct gf100_ramfuc {
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x137390;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f290;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f294;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f298;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f29c;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f2a0;
+ struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f290[5];
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f300;
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f338;
@@ -104,6 +100,50 @@ struct gf100_ram {
struct nvbios_pll mempll;
};
+#define T(t) cfg->timing_10_##t
+static int
+gf100_ram_timing_calc(struct gf100_ram *ram, u32 *timing)
+{
+ struct nvbios_ramcfg *cfg = &ram->base.target.bios;
+ struct nvkm_subdev...
2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 03/11] nvkm/gddr5: MR calculation for timing table v1.0
...100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
index 6ebdc4c..b4fe3bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
@@ -50,11 +50,7 @@ struct gf100_ramfuc {
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f290[5];
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f300;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f338;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f340;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f344;
- struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f348;
+ struct ramfuc_reg r_mr[9];
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f910;
struct ramfuc_reg r_0x10f914;
@@ -226,6 +222,19 @@ gf100_ram_calc(struct nvkm_ram *base, u32 freq)
if (...
2017 Apr 10
11
Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+
- Timing calculation for Fermi
- GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that
pesky GT 240.
- A routine to translate a VBIOS init
2017 Apr 10
14
RESEND Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing
changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order
in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise.
Original message:
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern