Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r96492".
2010 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] Branch delay slots broken.
I still can't reproduce because it's fixed in trunk for Mips and Sparc
for a long time now, you must be using a really old version! :)
Just for reference, it was fixed for Mips and Sparc in r108820 and r96492.
Thanks anyway!
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Richard Pennington <rich at pennware.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 02:01 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>>> You changes work for me also. I applied something similar to the Mips CG
>>>...
2010 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Branch delay slots broken.
On 12/17/2010 02:01 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> You changes work for me also. I applied something similar to the Mips CG
>> and they worked there also. Thanks again.
>
> I can't reproduce the same problem here for Mips using clang, could
> you please attach the bitcode you used?
> Thanks
>
Hi Bruno,
This was the bitcode from a simple
2010 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] Branch delay slots broken.
Hi Richard,
> You changes work for me also. I applied something similar to the Mips CG
> and they worked there also. Thanks again.
I can't reproduce the same problem here for Mips using clang, could
you please attach the bitcode you used?
Thanks
--
Bruno Cardoso Lopes
http://www.brunocardoso.cc
2010 Feb 09
3
[LLVMdev] How to check for "SPARC code generation" in MachineBasicBlock.cpp?
On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote:
>> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention).
>
> Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen.
>
>> However I still