search for: r94535

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r94535".

Did you mean: r294535
2010 Jan 26
1
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 17:56, Rafael Espindola wrote: > On what architecture did you got the error? We have AlignmentIsInBytes > in MCAsmInfo for that. It is probably wrong for your architecture. Thanks. This was on ARM, and this one-line diff against r94535 made it work for me. -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store...
2010 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align
2010/1/25 Edmund Grimley Evans <Edmund.Grimley-Evans at arm.com>: > I just got this error message from the GNU assembler: > > Error: alignment too large: 15 assumed > > Which made me laugh at first. The corresponding input line was: > >        .align  16 > > Apparently what's going on here is that ".align 16" is ambiguous: on > some architectures
2010 Jan 25
5
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align
I just got this error message from the GNU assembler: Error: alignment too large: 15 assumed Which made me laugh at first. The corresponding input line was: .align 16 Apparently what's going on here is that ".align 16" is ambiguous: on some architectures it means ".balign 16", and on some it means ".p2align 16", which would mean ".balign 65536" if