search for: r90454

...sses and all X86-Backend passes. There is still some passes that have corner cases where the ProfileInfo is not correct after the pass. Some passes are still missing... How shall I proceed with this? Andi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-r90454.profileinfo-preservation.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 67672 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091203/22e0c60c/attachment.patch>

...ineFunctionAnalysis is required and preserved. The problem mentioned by me was in a newly created BranchFolderPass::getAnalysisUsage() method which did not call MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(). Andi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-r90454.passmanager.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091203/59f0eb99/attachment.patch>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> wrote: > > If I use  AU.addRequired<ProfileInfo>() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp the > wrong ProfileInfo is used. It uses the "No ProfileInfo" implementation > if ProfileInfo but not the one from ProfileInfoLoaderPass. (Which is > immediately discarded after creation.) > You need to

...ve ProfileInfo in all -std-compile-opts passes and all X86-Backend passes. > > There is still some passes that have corner cases where the ProfileInfo is not correct after the pass. Some passes are still missing... > > How shall I proceed with this? > > Andi > > <llvm-r90454.profileinfo-preservation.patch>_______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev