search for: r8cn0qggrvmrpc3

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r8cn0qggrvmrpc3".

32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
2019 Feb 15
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes: > 1) Why is the log saying `SMB2` everywhere? Shouldn't it be saying > `SMB3`? "SMB3" is mostly marketing, it inherits almost everything from SMB2 hence why it's often handled by SMB2 code. You will see this in Samba, Wireshark, Linux, and even Microsoft specification "MS-SMB2" which actually covers both
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
2019 Feb 16
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...ryone time. > I tried looking at the network capture using `tcpdump -A -X` but wasn't able to understand anything. I tried installing wireshark on a throwaway cloud instance, but realised that it's a GUI program. Can you please help be with the network trace at https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8cn0qggrvmrpc3/dump.pcap?dl=0 ? It's capturing the network chatter for ~1min of `ls -lR` on the shared folder. Does this help in getting to the bottom of this problem? > Also, please attach files or disable word-wrapping when you send logs in > the future. > Ah - I thought most mailing lists scrub...
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
2019 Feb 18
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...tried looking at the network capture using `tcpdump -A -X` but wasn't > able to understand anything. I tried installing wireshark on a throwaway > cloud instance, but realised that it's a GUI program. Can you please help > be with the network trace at > https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8cn0qggrvmrpc3/dump.pcap?dl=0 ? It's capturing > the network chatter for ~1min of `ls -lR` on the shared folder. Does this > help in getting to the bottom of this problem? > Help in analysing the tcpdump to get to the bottom of this perf issue would be appreciated. -- Saurabh.
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
2019 Feb 16
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...tried looking at the network capture using `tcpdump -A -X` but wasn't > able to understand anything. I tried installing wireshark on a throwaway > cloud instance, but realised that it's a GUI program. Can you please help > be with the network trace at > https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8cn0qggrvmrpc3/dump.pcap?dl=0 ? It's capturing > the network chatter for ~1min of `ls -lR` on the shared folder. Does this > help in getting to the bottom of this problem? > > >> Also, please attach files or disable word-wrapping when you send logs in >> the future. >> > Ah -...