search for: r78652

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r78652".

Did you mean: r78653
2020 Jun 07
4
[External] Re: use of the tcltk package crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows
I've committed the change to use Free instead of free in tcltk.c and sys-std.c (r78652 for R-devel, r78653 for R-patched). We might consider either moving Calloc/Free out of the Windows remapping or moving the remapping into header files so everything seeing our header files uses our calloc/free. Either would be less brittle that the current status. Best, luke On Sun, 7 Jun 2020,...
2020 Jun 07
0
[External] use of the tcltk package crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows
...he walls come tumbling down. If the "#if defined(Win32)" block had been inside RS.h, the problem wouldn't arise. -pd > On 8 Jun 2020, at 00:03 , luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: > > I've committed the change to use Free instead of free in tcltk.c and > sys-std.c (r78652 for R-devel, r78653 for R-patched). > > We might consider either moving Calloc/Free out of the Windows > remapping or moving the remapping into header files so everything > seeing our header files uses our calloc/free. Either would be less > brittle that the current status. > &g...
2020 Jun 07
3
[External] Re: use of the tcltk package crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, peter dalgaard wrote: > > > So this wasn't tested for a month? > > > > Anyways, Free() is just free() with a check that we're not freeing a null pointer, followed by setting the pointer to NULL. At that point of tcltk.c, we have > > > > for (objc = i = 0;