search for: r76468

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "r76468".

Did you mean: r76467
2019 May 10
2
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
...> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about > | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or > | do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? > Again, that would happen in the sources you pick up from me, and per > part1 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d60792d3f404cc970ab33ebee1d4481a770ec15c > part2 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/05046138c6fa9b40b9676f6b67498d74281d5030 > it only affects gfortran >= 7,...
2019 May 10
2
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
...an >= 7: it would be great if you > could pull this change into the R 3.6.0 backports for buster. Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? > In principle I think all Fortran BLAS/LAPACK implementations (refblas > and ATLAS) packaged for buster should be recompiled with > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls (they may be fine in case they were compiled > with older version of gfortran-8, but then the next rebuild will cause >...
2019 May 10
0
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or | do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? Again, that would happen in the sources you pick up from me, and per part1 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d60792d3f404cc970ab33ebee1d4481a770ec15c part2 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/05046138c6fa9b40b9676f6b67498d74281d5030 it only affects gfortran >= 7, and my Debian stabl...
2019 May 10
0
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
...Eddelbuettel writes: | | > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: | > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about | > | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or | > | do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? | | > Again, that would happen in the sources you pick up from me, and per | | > part1 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d60792d3f404cc970ab33ebee1d4481a770ec15c | > part2 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/05046138c6fa9b40b9676f6b67498d74281d5030 | | > it only affects gfo...
2019 May 10
2
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
...| > | > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: > | > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about > | > | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or > | > | do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? > | > | > Again, that would happen in the sources you pick up from me, and per > | > | > part1 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d60792d3f404cc970ab33ebee1d4481a770ec15c > | > part2 https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/05046138c6fa9b40b9676f6b67498d74281d5030 >...
2019 Apr 29
3
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 15:03:54 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes: > > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > >> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes: > >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in > >> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries