Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "r76395".
2020 Jan 13
3
choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...4)
[1] 0.9999979
> choose(3.9999999, 4)
[1] 0
> choose(4, 4)
[1] 1
> choose(4.0000001, 4)
[1] 4
> choose(4.000001, 4)
[1] 1.000002
Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
Thanks,
Erik
***
sessionInfo()
R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2020 Jan 13
3
choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...4)
[1] 0.9999979
> choose(3.9999999, 4)
[1] 0
> choose(4, 4)
[1] 1
> choose(4.0000001, 4)
[1] 4
> choose(4.000001, 4)
[1] 1.000002
Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
Thanks,
Erik
***
sessionInfo()
R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2019 Sep 29
2
typeof(getOption("warn")) is "integer" instead of "double" in R unstable (2019-09-27 r77229)? Reproducible?
...lso using older C compilers:
- R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-20 r77199)
- R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-22 r77202)
- R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-25 r77217)
- R version 3.6.1 Patched (2019-09-25 r77224)
- R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
- R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
- R version 3.5.3 (2019-03-11)
- R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
2020 Jan 14
2
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...>>> [1] 1.000002
>>>
>>> Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erik
>>>
>>> ***
>>> sessionInfo()
>>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>>
>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-help at r-project.org mailing li...
2020 Jan 14
1
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...> [1] 1
>> choose(4.0000001, 4)
> [1] 4
>> choose(4.000001, 4)
> [1] 1.000002
>
> Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> ***
> sessionInfo()
> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.eth...
2019 Sep 29
2
typeof(getOption("warn")) is "integer" instead of "double" in R unstable (2019-09-27 r77229)? Reproducible?
...(unstable) (2019-09-20 r77199)
> > - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-22 r77202)
> > - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-25 r77217)
> > - R version 3.6.1 Patched (2019-09-25 r77224)
> > - R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
> > - R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
> > - R version 3.5.3 (2019-03-11)
> > - R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> >
>
>
2020 Jan 14
4
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...ould base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Erik
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>> sessionInfo()
>>>>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>>>>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>>>>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>>>>
>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________...
2019 Sep 29
0
typeof(getOption("warn")) is "integer" instead of "double" in R unstable (2019-09-27 r77229)? Reproducible?
...gt; - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-20 r77199)
> - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-22 r77202)
> - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-25 r77217)
> - R version 3.6.1 Patched (2019-09-25 r77224)
> - R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
> - R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
> - R version 3.5.3 (2019-03-11)
> - R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
2020 Jan 14
0
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...> [1] 4
>>> choose(4.000001, 4)
>> [1] 1.000002
>>
>> Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>> ***
>> sessionInfo()
>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more,...
2020 Jan 14
0
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...t;>>
>>>> Should base::choose(n, k) check whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Erik
>>>>
>>>> ***
>>>> sessionInfo()
>>>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>>>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>>>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>>>
>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-help a...
2020 Jan 15
1
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...e precision of k and return 1?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> sessionInfo()
>>>>>>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>>>>>>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>>>>>>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>...
2020 Jan 14
0
[R] choose(n, k) as n approaches k
...k whether n is within machine precision of k and return 1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> sessionInfo()
>>>>>> R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
>>>>>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
>>>>>> Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________...