search for: r72768

...t; >> -Kirill >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/krlmlr/r-source/pull/5/files >> >> [2] >> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/krlmlr/r-source/pull/5.diff > I forgot to mention that this patch applies cleanly to r72768. Thank you, Kirill. I've been a bit busy so did not get to reply more quickly. Just to be clear: I did not ask for a patch but was _asking_ / requesting comments about the possibility to do that. In the mean time, within the core team, the opinions were mixed and costs of the change (recompi...

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > > Current R-exts reads > > > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);

...ch -p1`) would > be [2]. The code compiles on my system. > > > -Kirill > > > [1] https://github.com/krlmlr/r-source/pull/5/files > > [2] > https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/krlmlr/r-source/pull/5.diff I forgot to mention that this patch applies cleanly to r72768. -Kirill > > >> >> Martin >> >> > Best regards >> > Kirill > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel