search for: r7000

On 01/14/2016 04:47 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:33:40PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> Don't be fooled here by words "ordered" and "completed" - it is HW >> design items and actually written poorly. >> Just assume that SYNC_MB is absolutely the same as SYNC for any CPU >> and coherent device (besides performance).

On 01/14/2016 04:47 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:33:40PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> Don't be fooled here by words "ordered" and "completed" - it is HW >> design items and actually written poorly. >> Just assume that SYNC_MB is absolutely the same as SYNC for any CPU >> and coherent device (besides performance).

...o SYNC at all - yes, it is still possible that SYNC on >> some systems can be too heavy or even harmful, nobody tested that. > I don't recall being asked; In http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10505/ the very last mesg exchange is: Maciej, do you have an R4000 / R4600 / R5000 / R7000 / SiByte system at hand to test this? ... Ralf Maciej W. Rozycki <http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?submitter=79> - June 5, 2015, 9:18 p.m. On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Ralf Baechle wrote: > do you have an R4000 / R4600 / R5000 / R7000 / SiByte system at hand to >...

...mail/linux/kernel/1601.3/03080.html>. > There's a reference to an older message of mine there too. I hope this > answers your questions. > > Maciej In http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10505/the very last mesg exchange is: Maciej, do you have an R4000 / R4600 / R5000 / R7000 / SiByte system at hand to test this? ... Ralf Maciej W. Rozycki- June 5, 2015, 9:18 p.m. On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Ralf Baechle wrote: > do you have an R4000 / R4600 / R5000 / R7000 / SiByte system at hand to > test this? I should be able to check R4400 (that is virtually the same as R400...

Hi, I have some questions about tinc. " *Automatic full mesh routing*Regardless of how you set up the tinc daemons to connect to each other, VPN traffic is always (if possible) sent directly to the destination, without going through intermediate hops. " 1- To have client to client direct connection and don't have traffic through the server should I have port forward at the NAT? Or

...of web interface to manager the server? Tinc itself does not come with any web ui. However, I created a web ui for tomato firmware, which is available for select routers with the broadcom chipset. The "shibby" tomato firmware supports many newer routers, including ARM variants; Netgear R7000, Asus RT-68U etc. http://tomato.groov.pl/ I even made one that will run on the ancient wrt54gl. http://files.lancethepants.com/Firmware/MIPSR1/Toastman%207636%20%2B%20Tinc1.1.pre11/ > 3- Any release date of tinc 2.0 version? Tinc 1.1 final still has not been released, and there is no definite...

...m hopeful at least one will adopt Tinc into their future releases. I'm on the dev team, but they have the final say if they want it in their distro. If they do, it will likely find it's way also into a few ARM supported Tomato routers as well, likeAsus RT-n56u, Asus RT-n68u, and Netgear r7000. Linksys wrt1900ac, should eventually be supported (not for a while though). You're supportive/positive feedback in the tomato forum may help them make that decision. Otherwise I'll try and keep these images up-to-date with Toastman upstream and Tinc releases. -Lance

...er? >> > Tinc itself does not come with any web ui. > However, I created a web ui for tomato firmware, which is available for > select routers with the broadcom chipset. > > The "shibby" tomato firmware supports many newer routers, including ARM > variants; Netgear R7000, Asus RT-68U etc. > http://tomato.groov.pl/ > > I even made one that will run on the ancient wrt54gl. > > http://files.lancethepants.com/Firmware/MIPSR1/Toastman%207636%20%2B%20Tinc1.1.pre11/ > > 3- Any release date of tinc 2.0 version? >> > Tinc 1.1 final still has n...

..... colo-7400-2 uptime is 6 years, 43 weeks, 3 days, 14 hours, 13 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 00:40:17 UTC Tue Feb 10 2009 System restarted at 00:43:11 UTC Tue Feb 10 2009 ... Cisco 7401ASR (NSE) processor (revision A) with 491520K/32768K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 74993065 R7000 CPU at 375MHz, Implementation 39, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2 Cache 1 slot ASR midplane, Version 2.0 Last reset from power-on PXF processor tmc 'system:pxf/ucode0' is running ( v1.1 ). 2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces 509K bytes of NVRAM. ...................................................................

..., including the AGP 4x TNT2 card which is not even connected to the AGP bridge. Setting nouveau.agpmode=0 makes it work but how can we make this case work automatically? Radeon driver does some "ring test" and if it fails, it disables AGP mode and retries. That seems to work a bit (with R7000 but not with R7200). But I think that we shouldn't even touch the AGP registers of other devices in this case as it might break the integrated video. But how can we know that the card is connected to the AGP bus? There does not seem to be a reliable way... dmesg: [ 22.015411] nouveau [ DE...

Hi, I have a serious problem to configure Cisco AS5XXX and Asterisk , I trying to use asterisk for PSTN(A)----> Cisco AS5xxx ----> ASterisk---->PSTN(B) (No Nat, no Firewall) I hear (on the PSTN(A)) clearly what the other person is saying, but the other person (on the PSTN(B) side) hears nothing from PSTN(A). I use tcpdump for debug de rtp trafic, and ouput contains