search for: r58548

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r58548".

Did you mean: 558548
2008 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v2)
Tanya M. Lattner dixit: >LLVMers, > >The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: >http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ Is it correct that there is no matching clang distfile? A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. (But then, maybe it’d be best anyway if I port llvm-current to MirBSD, because it’ll be easier for you to merge the diffs back in.) bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [an...
2008 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] clang (was Re: 2.4 Pre-release (v2))
Dixi quod… >A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, >seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. However, clang r58565 does not build with llvm r58565 either: llvm[4]: Compiling BasicConstraintManager.cpp for Release-Asserts build mpcxx -I/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58565-0/llvm/include -I/usr/ports/lan...
2008 Oct 31
7
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v2)
LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the
2008 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] clang (was Re: 2.4 Pre-release (v2))
Hello, Thorsten >>A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, >>seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. That's correct. > Any suggestions? Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct way of building clang. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and M...