Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "r55".
Did you mean:
55
2006 Feb 24
1
r55 - trunk/debian
Author: ultrotter
Date: 2006-02-24 19:29:40 +0000 (Fri, 24 Feb 2006)
New Revision: 55
Modified:
trunk/debian/copyright
Log:
Update FSF address
Modified: trunk/debian/copyright
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/copyright 2006-02-24 19:14:50 UTC (rev 54)
+++ trunk/debian/copyright 2006-02-24 19:29:40 UTC (rev 55)
@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@
You
2010 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] Question on X86 backend
...call
let isCall = 1,
Defs = [
R0, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15,
R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31,
R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R40, R41, R42, R43, R44, R45, R46, R47,
R48, R49, R50, R51, R52, R53, R54, R55, R56, R57, R58, R59, R60, R61, R62, R63,
R64, R65, R66, R67, R68, R69, R70, R71, R72, R73, R74, R75, R76, R77, R78, R79,
R80, R81, R82, R83, R84, R85, R86, R87, R88, R89, R90, R91, R92, R93, R94, R95,
R96, R97, R98, R99, R100, R101, R102, R103, R104, R105, R106, R107, R108, R109, R110, R111,
R1...
2010 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] Question on X86 backend
Hi Micah,
> In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for
> argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the
> location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a
> where or how?
the register uses are added by the function
X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is
the relevant code segment:
// Add
2006 Aug 21
0
[Fwd: Re: Connecting CentOS to IPSEC VPN (Checkpoint FW1)]
...e: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:20:55 +0200
From: carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608211506400.10079 at horsea.3ti.be>
Dag,
Using Openswan, racoon, etc ... as a IPSEC gateway to interoperate
with CP FW-1 NG R55, NGX and so on is possible, but it is not possible
to configure as a roadwarrior linux client.
Bye.
Dag Wieers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have experience using IPSEC on CentOS in order to connect to
> vendor IPSEC-based VPN products (specifically Checkpoint FW1) ?
>
> Is...
2009 Jul 01
0
help with superscripts in simple plots
...panel.text(1994, y=0.4, label=bquote(R^2 == .(R17)), cex=0.75 )
panel.text(x=1996, y=0.8, labels="Mean API", cex = 0.75)
panel.text(x=1996, y=0.13, labels="Proportion of Hatched Eggs" ,
cex=0.75)
panel.text(1996, y=0.08, label=bquote(R^2 == .(R55)),
cex=0.75)
panel.text(x=1989, y=1.0, labels="Relative Mean Number Eggs Per
Nests Per Year" , cex = 0.75)
panel.text(x= 1989, y = 0.93, label=bquote(R^2 == .(R44)), cex
= 0.75)
trellis.unfocus()
But when I use the following in a much simpler plot I can't...
2006 Aug 21
3
Connecting CentOS to IPSEC VPN (Checkpoint FW1)
Hi,
Does anyone have experience using IPSEC on CentOS in order to connect to
vendor IPSEC-based VPN products (specifically Checkpoint FW1) ?
Is the included IPSEC implementation sufficient, or do people have to rely
on OpenSWAN or FreeSWAN ? I'd be testing tomorrow and I'm interested with
experiences others have had and things to look out for.
Thanks in advance,
-- dag wieers, dag
2015 Jun 07
43
[Bug 90887] New: PhiMovesPass in register allocator broken
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90887
Bug ID: 90887
Summary: PhiMovesPass in register allocator broken
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau
Assignee: nouveau at
2012 Feb 13
10
[RFB] add LZ4 compression method to btrfs
...9.4%
snappy-c = 836415 us ( 253 MB/s) 300567 us ( 705 MB/s) 211957760 -> 131060567 61.8%
lzo 2.06 1x_1 = 639305 us ( 331 MB/s) 470840 us ( 450 MB/s) 211957760 -> 100576151 47.5%
* snappy 1.0.4 svn r58
* snappy-c as Andi sent it to mailinglist
* lzo 2.0.6 1x_1 variant
* lz4 r55 (r54 + bugfix in the hash table entry type)
* compiled by gcc 4.7, -O2
pullable from:
git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/btrfs-unstable.git dev/compression-squad
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.o...
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking