Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r54494".
2008 Aug 08
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Shipman <dshipman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
> include path)
> error. Any idea what's happening here?
>
No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here)
Try adding:
#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
to limitx.h like so:
#ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
+#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
#include_next <...
2008 Aug 07
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
Hi Matthijs,
>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to
>> test out Mike's suggestion to see if it's a better way of doing it.
> I just tried building llvm-gcc without your hack, and it still works (even
> without the fix Mike suggested).
>
> So, it seems that r54245 can be reverted again?
>
> I didn't test bootstrap, however,
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
include path)
error. Any idea what's happening here?
Thanks,
-David Shipman
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthijs,
>
>>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good...
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
...to use it,
although my impression is that it shouldn't be necessary?
-David Shipman
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Shipman <dshipman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
>> include path)
>> error. Any idea what's happening here?
>>
> No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here)
>
> Try adding:
>
> #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
>
> to limitx.h like so:
>
> #ifdef _GCC_NE...