search for: r4nt

...much more than emails. Let me know how >> I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). > > Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're deploying: > > http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status > > That'll lead you here: > > https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews > https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator FWIW: which branch is the deployed llvm one? llvm/master ? llvm/r4nt-master ? -- Eitan Adler

...gt; I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). > > > > Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're > deploying: > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status > > > > That'll lead you here: > > > > https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews > > https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator > > FWIW: which branch is the deployed llvm one? llvm/master ? > llvm/r4nt-master ? > Ah, sorry, it's r4nt-staging (for completely bogus reasons, I need to change that). Thanks! /Manuel > > > > > > -...

...much more than emails. Let me know how >> I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). > > Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're deploying: > > http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status > > That'll lead you here: > > https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews > https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator > > And soon there'll be some bugs to squash in llvm.org/bugs ;) On a related note we're using Phabricator in FreeBSD, with a similar workflow to LLVM and with a similar set of user opinions. Some of our users really like web-b...

...I like Phabricator for code review much much more than emails. Let me know how > I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're deploying: http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status That'll lead you here: https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator And soon there'll be some bugs to squash in llvm.org/bugs ;) > — > Mehdi > > On May 27, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Quick update from IRC chat: > Justin (and an...

Hi Manuel, I like Phabricator for code review much much more than emails. Let me know how I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). — Mehdi > On May 27, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Quick update from IRC chat: > Justin (and anybody else who wants to) is going to file bugs against our phab workflow on the llvm-bugtracker until we get a

Could we ever consider adding https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production as a new read/only observe Diffusion repository in reviews.llvm.org? I'd be happy to do code reviews? MyDeveloperDay On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:46 PM MyDeveloper Day <mydeveloperday at gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome, thanks for sharing > > Here is...

...ons in a fork of the > Phabricator source (llvm-phabricator)? Firstly we should be keeping any > changes we make in source control but also it's good to review those > changes. > I didn't innovate, Manuel set it up originally and I just reused the flow there: https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production That said our "pre-production" setup isn't super streamlined, I'd like to improve this in the future. Let me know if you have suggestions :) > I have found over the years that I've had to redo some of my local > modifications as @evan...

...gt; > Not sure it's necessarily quite that clear-cut. LLVM folks might want > the customizations, but if Phab with customizations isn't maintained, > it might be a choice between Phab without those customizations (what > are they?) I believe it is all there: https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production As far as I know it is mostly about the interactions with the email workflow for the *-commits@ mailing-lists, but Manuel knows best here :) -- Mehdi > or GitHub, email, etc - which might be a different > choice/tradeoff. > > > What are our alt...

...B was willing to take this on for the next 10 years ;) and you'd find a couple of folks at FB, that might be fairly simple, while the LLVM foundation is currently afaiu not set up to easily create funding even for the relatively cheap cloud setup we need 3. Mehdi is correct, https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production is what's currently running; one of the next tasks would be to see whether we can get rid of more of the customizations we have (I actually have no idea how far we are, Eric is not on the team any more, and he's afaict been the last person to upgrade phab)...

...'d find a couple of folks at FB, that might be fairly >> simple, while the LLVM foundation is currently afaiu not set up to easily >> create funding even for the relatively cheap cloud setup we need >> >> >> >> 3. Mehdi is correct, >> https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production is what's >> currently running; one of the next tasks would be to see whether we can get >> rid of more of the customizations we have (I actually have no idea how far >> we are, Eric is not on the team any more, and he's afaict been the las...

...'d find a couple of folks at FB, that might be fairly >> simple, while the LLVM foundation is currently afaiu not set up to easily >> create funding even for the relatively cheap cloud setup we need >> >> >> >> 3. Mehdi is correct, >> https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production is what's >> currently running; one of the next tasks would be to see whether we can get >> rid of more of the customizations we have (I actually have no idea how far >> we are, Eric is not on the team any more, and he's afaict been the las...

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:25 AM James Henderson < jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the work too! > > Not specifically a regression, but since the upgrade, I find it annoying > now that when I want to do something in relation to an inline comment > (collapse it, reply to it etc), I now have to click on a drop-down menu in > the comment header bar to

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:04 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:56 AM Hubert Tong via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Anton