search for: r47180

...6- > apple-darwin9 > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5546) (LLVM build 9999) > > It's 4.2 based llvm-gcc. Ok, so the gcc line on the tester web pages is worse than useless. Works for me. Make sure your llvm-gcc-4.2 is up to date, you need r47180. The r46865 above suggests you might not have it.

...d errors, cbe errors, or when looking at performance numbers > (compared to gcc). > > -Tanya OK, I am corrected. I do believe the version of %llvmgcc in use would also be useful (for me, more useful). >> Works for me. Make sure your llvm-gcc-4.2 is up to date, you need >> r47180. The r46865 above suggests you might not have it. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > __...

...line on the tester web pages is worse than useless. > The gcc line is not useless. Its helpful if you want to figure out build errors, cbe errors, or when looking at performance numbers (compared to gcc). -Tanya > Works for me. Make sure your llvm-gcc-4.2 is up to date, you need > r47180. The r46865 above suggests you might not have it. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

llvm itself is built with gcc-4.0, but the run line is: // RUN: %llvmgxx -S -O0 -emit-llvm %s -o - | grep retval | grep S242 | grep {i32 1} | count 2 According the log: FAIL: /Volumes/Muggles/LLVM/nightlytest-pic/build/llvm/test/C+ +Frontend/2008-02-13-sret.cpp Failed with exit(1) at line 1 while running: /usr/local/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S -O0 -emit-llvm /

On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > But I am using llvm-gcc-4.2. Any idea why it's failing? > > Evan All the failing testers are using gcc-4.0 according to the web pages they point at. > On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> On Feb 16, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Apache wrote: >>> New Test Failures: >>>