Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r42486".
Did you mean:
542486
2007 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...ecks whether a tail call is really eligible
for optimization so that it performs the check/fix in
SelectionDAGISel.cpp:BuildSelectionDAG() as suggest by Evan. Also
eliminated an error that caused the remaining failing test cases in
the test-suite.
The results look very nice (on darwin x86, r42486).
The same number (46) of failing test cases on patched version and
vanilla version. LCCBETA was enabled on both. I changed the LCCBETA
option in Makefile.programs in the patched version to include the
tail-call-opt flags so that the optimization code gets exercised.
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
LLCBE...
2007 Sep 26
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Evan Cheng wrote:
>> the stack adjustment only fastcc was not one of them. Now that fastcc
>> can cause tail call optimization i had to change the convention from
>> caller pops arguments to callee pops arguments in order to allow tail
>> call optimization in a general way.
>
> Hmmm. Ok. So this is due to X86CallingConv.td changes? Unfortunately
2007 Oct 03
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...eally
> eligible for optimization so that it performs the check/fix in
> SelectionDAGISel.cpp:BuildSelectionDAG() as suggest by Evan. Also
> eliminated an error that caused the remaining failing test cases in
> the test-suite.
>
> The results look very nice (on darwin x86, r42486).
> The same number (46) of failing test cases on patched version and
> vanilla version. LCCBETA was enabled on both. I changed the LCCBETA
> option in Makefile.programs in the patched version to include the
> tail-call-opt flags so that the optimization code gets exercised.
Ok....
2007 Oct 04
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...eally
> eligible for optimization so that it performs the check/fix in
> SelectionDAGISel.cpp:BuildSelectionDAG() as suggest by Evan. Also
> eliminated an error that caused the remaining failing test cases in
> the test-suite.
>
> The results look very nice (on darwin x86, r42486).
> The same number (46) of failing test cases on patched version and
> vanilla version. LCCBETA was enabled on both. I changed the LCCBETA
> option in Makefile.programs in the patched version to include the
> tail-call-opt flags so that the optimization code gets exercised.
>...