Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r32x4".
Did you mean:
32x4
2004 Nov 19
1
[LLVMdev] LowerPacked pass
...of a problem for my use, but A is a bit
annoying even though I mostly pass pointers to packed types anyway. Can
you elaborate a bit on what is the problem with this? I have calls going
back into our code by adding mappings to the JIT, but I'm not sure if I
can get it to call functions with R32x4 (<float x 4>) args without
making a wrapper that takes a pointer.
> For your work, it might be most expedient to just ignore the lower packed
> pass and add SSE support to the X86 backend: that will get you up and
> running quickly and get you the performance you are obviously afte...
2004 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] LowerPacked pass
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote:
> Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as
> packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the
> LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed
> that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass()
> function so they can be added to the PassManager, but
2004 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] LowerPacked pass
Hello,
Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as
packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the
LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed
that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass()
function so they can be added to the PassManager, but LowerPacked
doesn't have this... What should I do?