search for: r328903

LLD revision is r331862. To add, I had initially tried it on r328903, which also reproduced the issue. On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't initially tried ToT, but it > reproduces in ToT as well when I tried. > > $ ./clang --version &...

...t reproduce using gold, and they utilize the same underlying LTO API. Let me dig a little using save-temps and see where they diverge. Teresa On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:28 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> wrote: > LLD revision is r331862. To add, I had initially tried it on r328903, > which also reproduced the issue. > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Teresa, >> >> Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't initially tried ToT, but it >> reproduces in ToT as well when I...

...utilize the same underlying LTO API. Let me > dig a little using save-temps and see where they diverge. > Teresa > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:28 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> > wrote: > >> LLD revision is r331862. To add, I had initially tried it on r328903, >> which also reproduced the issue. >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Teresa, >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't initially tried ToT, but it >>&...

...LTO API. Let me >> dig a little using save-temps and see where they diverge. >> Teresa >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:28 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> LLD revision is r331862. To add, I had initially tried it on r328903, >>> which also reproduced the issue. >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Teresa, >>>> >>>> Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't initi...

...; dig a little using save-temps and see where they diverge. >>> Teresa >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:28 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> LLD revision is r331862. To add, I had initially tried it on r328903, >>>> which also reproduced the issue. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Teresa, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for lookin...

Hi Teresa, Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't initially tried ToT, but it reproduces in ToT as well when I tried. $ ./clang --version clang version 7.0.0 (trunk 331879) (llvm/trunk 331888) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /ssd2/pirama/llvm-upstream/llvm-release/bin/. $ ./ld.lld --version LLD 7.0.0 (https://git.llvm.org/git/lld.git

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:43 AM Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > Hi Pirama, > > I can't reproduce with either lld or gold, using a compiler built from > head. What version is your clang? > (and your lld) > > Thanks, > Teresa > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:50 PM Pirama Arumuga Nainar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>