search for: r323155

Hi all, I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, release notes please :-) Thanks, Hans -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pip...

...dler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: >> > >> > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to >> > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting >> > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, >> > release notes please :-) >> >> Eep, please can we keep the command line option for clang and t...

There was one open issue that i landed the fix for today. I was letting bots clear out before i ping you with the patch series to merge. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:11 AM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to merge > this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting for? Also, > were there any followups I should know about? Also, release notes please :-) > > Thanks, > Hans > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org <mailto:dwmw2 at infradead.org>> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to > > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting > > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, > > release notes please :-) > > Eep, please can we keep the command line option...

On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, > release notes please :-) Eep, please can we keep the command line option for clang and the thunk ABI matching what GCC, the Linux ke...

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to > > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting > > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, > > release notes please :-) > > Eep, please can we keep the command line option for clang and the thunk > ABI ma...

...ail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013198.html). * Don Hinton has written an RFC on [re-organising the handling of CMake policies](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120707.html). ## LLVM commits * Support for the 'retpoline' mitigation against Spectre on x86 has been merged. [r323155](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL323155). * New documentation has been added on adding exception handling support for a target. [r323311](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL323311). * A new utility has been written which uses bugpoint to reduce failures in GlobalISel tests. [r323248](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL3...

...at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org > <mailto:dwmw2 at infradead.org>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev > wrote: > > > > > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we > ready to > > > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're > waiting > > > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, > > > release notes please :-) > > > > Eep, please c...

...-dev] retpoline mitigation and 6.0 > Message-ID: <1517616233.31953.83.camel at infradead.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to > > merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting > > for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also, > > release notes please :-) > > Eep, please can we keep the command line option for clang and the thunk > ABI ma...