search for: r309529

Context: In r309526 (with a followup fix in r309529) I implemented the use of DWARF's debug_ranges base address specifier entries to reduce the number of object file relocations needed for debug_ranges*. * in a particular binary internally, an optimized build had a 70% reduction in debug_ranges.reloc, a 16% decrease in total object size (with c...

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:56 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Aug 7, 2017 6:58 PM, "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Context: > > In r309526 (with a followup fix in r309529) I implemented the use of > DWARF's debug_ranges base address specifier entries to reduce the number of > object file relocations needed for debug_ranges*. > > * in a particular binary internally, an optimized build had a 70% > reduction in debug_ranges.reloc, a 16% decrease in t...

...t:* Monday, August 07, 2017 6:58 PM > *To:* llvm-dev; Robinson, Paul; Adrian Prantl; Eric Christopher; Nico > Weber > *Subject:* DWARF: Ranges base address specifier entries & Gold's > gdb-index 32 bit bug > > > > Context: > > In r309526 (with a followup fix in r309529) I implemented the use of > DWARF's debug_ranges base address specifier entries to reduce the number of > object file relocations needed for debug_ranges*. > > * in a particular binary internally, an optimized build had a 70% > reduction in debug_ranges.reloc, a 16% decrease in t...

...t:* Monday, August 07, 2017 6:58 PM > *To:* llvm-dev; Robinson, Paul; Adrian Prantl; Eric Christopher; Nico > Weber > *Subject:* DWARF: Ranges base address specifier entries & Gold's > gdb-index 32 bit bug > > > > Context: > > In r309526 (with a followup fix in r309529) I implemented the use of > DWARF's debug_ranges base address specifier entries to reduce the number of > object file relocations needed for debug_ranges*. > > * in a particular binary internally, an optimized build had a 70% > reduction in debug_ranges.reloc, a 16% decrease in t...