Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r303542".
2017 May 31
0
Buildbots timing out on full builds
Is https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/100829/ replacement for
r303341?
If so LGTM.
r303542 msan AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp: 1m17.209s
r303542+diff/100829/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/100829/>
msan AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp: 1m24.724s
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com>
wrote:
> Great! I expect I...
2017 May 31
2
Buildbots timing out on full builds
...o that I don't have to re-commit the regression before fixing it.
> On 31 May 2017, at 13:48, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This runs in:
> real 13m6.296s
> user 42m45.191s
> sys 1m2.030s
>
> (on top of a fully built r303542). It should be fine for the ARM bots.
>
> However, you need to 'return std::move(M)' at line 1884.
>
> @Vitaly, is it ok for your bots as well?
>
> Cheers,
> Diana
>
> On 31 May 2017 at 10:21, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com <mailto:daniel_...
2017 May 31
2
Buildbots timing out on full builds
....o with asan enabled and running under instruments's Allocation profiler, my machine reports that the cumulative memory allocations is down to ~3.5GB (was ~10GB), the number of allocations down to ~4 million (was ~23 million), and the compile time down to ~15s (was ~60s).
The patch is based on r303542 and the main change is that most of the generated C++ has been replaced with a state-machine based implementation. It's not fully converted to a state-machine yet since it generates lots of smaller machines (one matcher and one emitter per rule) instead of a single machine but it's hopefull...
2017 May 25
2
Buildbots timing out on full builds
...I have a couple more nearly-finished patches I'd like to get in before we introduce the state machine. Hopefully, the above tricks will be enough to save me a re-write.
> On 25 May 2017, at 16:11, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I built r303542, then applied your patch and built again and it still takes
> real 34m30.279s
> user 84m36.553s
> sys 0m58.372s
>
> This is better than the 50m I saw before, but I think we should try to
> make it a bit faster. Do you have any other ideas to make it work?
>
> Tha...
2017 May 22
4
Buildbots timing out on full builds
Hi Daniel,
I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get:
real 18m28.882s
user 35m37.091s
sys 0m44.726s
and for r303259:
real 50m52.048s
user 88m25.473s
sys 0m46.548s
If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just
try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time.
Thanks,
Diana
On 22 May 2017 at 10:49, Daniel