Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "r302453".
2017 May 11
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0
> stur x9, [x29,#-48]
>
>
> Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them
> shortly.
>
>
> Should be fixed by r302679
>
>
> Thanks Quentin,
>
> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>
> Kristof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 12
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0
> stur x9, [x29,#-48]
>
>
> Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them
> shortly.
>
>
> Should be fixed by r302679
>
>
> Thanks Quentin,
>
> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>
> Kristof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 16
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Should be fixed by r302679
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks Quentin,
>>> >>
>>> >> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
>>> >> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
>>> >> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>>> >>
>>> >> Kristof
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>&g...
2017 May 12
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...es in my previous fix. I’ll do them
> >> shortly.
> >>
> >>
> >> Should be fixed by r302679
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Quentin,
> >>
> >> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
> >> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
> >> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
> >>
> >> Kristof
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >&g...
2017 May 10
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...17, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com <mailto:kristof.beyls at arm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Great Quentin :).
>>
>> I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57.
>> I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see details below for where I still see some).
>> On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run).
>> On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my p...
2017 May 18
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0
> stur x9, [x29,#-48]
>
>
> Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them
> shortly.
>
>
> Should be fixed by r302679
>
>
> Thanks Quentin,
>
> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>
> Kristof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 19
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them
>>> shortly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Should be fixed by r302679
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Quentin,
>>>
>>> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
>>> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
>>> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>>>
>>> Kristof
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-...
2017 May 09
4
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Great Quentin :).
I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57.
I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see details below for where I still see some).
On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run).
On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my previous run).
I also checke...
2017 May 09
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...g> wrote:
> Hi Kristof,
>
> On May 9, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Great Quentin :).
>
> I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm
> -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57.
> I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see
> details below for where I still see some).
> On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run).
> On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my previous...
2017 May 22
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0
> stur x9, [x29,#-48]
>
>
> Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them
> shortly.
>
>
> Should be fixed by r302679
>
>
> Thanks Quentin,
>
> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on
> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments.
> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%.
>
> Kristof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 Apr 27
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof,
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Quentin,
>
>> On 27 Apr 2017, at 00:48, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kristof,
>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com