search for: r302453

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "r302453".

2017 May 11
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0 > stur x9, [x29,#-48] > > > Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them > shortly. > > > Should be fixed by r302679 > > > Thanks Quentin, > > That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on > r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. > The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. > > Kristof > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 12
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0 > stur x9, [x29,#-48] > > > Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them > shortly. > > > Should be fixed by r302679 > > > Thanks Quentin, > > That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on > r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. > The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. > > Kristof > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 16
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...>> >>> >> >>> >> Should be fixed by r302679 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thanks Quentin, >>> >> >>> >> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on >>> >> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. >>> >> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. >>> >> >>> >> Kristof >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >&g...
2017 May 12
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...es in my previous fix. I’ll do them > >> shortly. > >> > >> > >> Should be fixed by r302679 > >> > >> > >> Thanks Quentin, > >> > >> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on > >> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. > >> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. > >> > >> Kristof > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailing list > >&g...
2017 May 10
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...17, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com <mailto:kristof.beyls at arm.com>> wrote: >> >> Great Quentin :). >> >> I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57. >> I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see details below for where I still see some). >> On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run). >> On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my p...
2017 May 18
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0 > stur x9, [x29,#-48] > > > Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them > shortly. > > > Should be fixed by r302679 > > > Thanks Quentin, > > That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on > r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. > The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. > > Kristof > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 May 19
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them >>> shortly. >>> >>> >>> Should be fixed by r302679 >>> >>> >>> Thanks Quentin, >>> >>> That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on >>> r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. >>> The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. >>> >>> Kristof >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-...
2017 May 09
4
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Great Quentin :). I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57. I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see details below for where I still see some). On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run). On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my previous run). I also checke...
2017 May 09
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...g> wrote: > Hi Kristof, > > On May 9, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > Great Quentin :). > > I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm > -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57. > I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see > details below for where I still see some). > On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run). > On geomean, code size increase is about 3% (down from 11% on my previous...
2017 May 22
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
...> fmov x9, d0 > stur x9, [x29,#-48] > > > Good finding, I forgot to do stores in my previous fix. I’ll do them > shortly. > > > Should be fixed by r302679 > > > Thanks Quentin, > > That reduces the slow-down when enabling globalisel at -O0 from 13% (on > r302453) to 9.5% (on r302679) in my experiments. > The code size increase also reduces from just over 3% to 2.8%. > > Kristof > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman...
2017 Apr 27
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, > On Apr 27, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > >> On 27 Apr 2017, at 00:48, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kristof, >> >>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com