Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r300970".
Did you mean:
r300870
2017 Apr 21
2
r300964 and the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot
...m.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/1331>) and I'm having trouble figuring out why. I had seen something similar before on MSVC so I tried fixing it in r300966 but with no luck. I then managed to reproduce it using an online MSVC compiler and fixed that issue in r300970 but still no luck. I'm going to revert the commit to make the bot green while I figure it out but I don't have a MSVC environment at the moment so I was wondering if anyone who does can reproduce the problem and tell me what it is that MSVC doesn't like.
Thanks
-------------- next part...
2017 Apr 21
3
r300964 and the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot
...ers/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/1331)
> and I'm having trouble figuring out why. I had seen something similar
> before on MSVC so I tried fixing it in r300966 but with no luck. I then
> managed to reproduce it using an online MSVC compiler and fixed that issue
> in r300970 but still no luck. I'm going to revert the commit to make the
> bot green while I figure it out but I don't have a MSVC environment at the
> moment so I was wondering if anyone who does can reproduce the problem and
> tell me what it is that MSVC doesn't like.
>
> Thanks...