search for: r2y

On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 23:46 -0500, g wrote: > until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; > > User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ > or > User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1 > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-quick-switch/ > or > User Agent Overrider 0.4.1

On Monday 16 July 2007 18:20, Evan Cheng wrote: > > Does the current implementation follow a published algorithm? If > > so, do we > > have a pointer to it? The comments are rather sparse and it's > > difficult to > > figure out what's going on at times. > > I don't know. I suspect not. I agree the current implementation is a > bit of a

On Jul 17, 2007, at 9:28 AM, David Greene wrote: > > [...] > 00369 // If the intervals were swapped by Join, swap them back so > that the > register > 00370 // mapping (in the r2i map) is correct. > 00371 if (Swapped) SrcInt.swap(DstInt); > > Whoops! At this point repSrcReg is not consistent with SrcInt and the > same goes for repDstReg! > > 00372

I know Centos is a 100% rebuilt of whatever Red Hat has produced, even though the version numbers are no longer visually identical and, as Johnny always writes, "If it ain't in the Red Hat version, it ain't in Centos" or words having the same meaning. Having got circa 20,000 hits, from all round the world, to a single dull web page in 2 days, I thought I would analyse the

On 03/23/16 18:42, Always Learning wrote: <> > My C5 Firefox string is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0". > > Ubunto has "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0" > > My questions are:- > > (1) Why can't we have 'Centos' in the Firefox browser string ?

On 03/23/2016 09:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 23:46 -0500, g wrote: > > >> until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; >> >> User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ >> or >> User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1 >>

Greetings R users, My interest in the Q2cum score comes my endeavor to replicate SIMCAP PLS-DA analysis in R. I use the exact same dataset. After doing the analysis in R, I can get the exact same R2Ycum. However, the Q2cum is significantly off. Adding the Q2cum of the 1st and 2nd component comes close but that seems unconvincing and I don't understand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be so far off. Below is the code and output: pls.reg.new=plsreg2(newserumvars.sc, newtimematrix, nc=3)...

Greetings R users, My interest in the Q2cum score comes my endeavor to replicate SIMCAP PLS-DA analysis in R.? I use the exact same dataset.? After doing the analysis in R, I can get the exact same R2Ycum.? However, the Q2cum is significantly off.? Adding the Q2cum of the 1st and 2nd component comes close but that seems unconvincing and I don't understand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be so far off.? Below is the code and output: pls.reg.new=plsreg2(newserumvars.sc, newtimematrix, nc=3)...

On Jul 16, 2007, at 9:12 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2007 13:32, David A. Greene wrote: >> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 15:07, Christopher Lamb wrote: >>> Could it be possible for there to be a harness type interface that >>> would allow coalescers that support both modes to be hooked into the >>> pass registration, and those that depend on the

On Friday 13 July 2007 13:32, David A. Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 15:07, Christopher Lamb wrote: > > Could it be possible for there to be a harness type interface that > > would allow coalescers that support both modes to be hooked into the > > pass registration, and those that depend on the allocator not be > > registered as passes? > > I have a

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking