Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r2vol".
Did you mean:
fsvol
2018 Apr 11
2
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...Throughput *631.82 MBps *time 3.3989 secs
> Brick: fsnode6.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
> Throughput *566.96 MBps *time 3.7877 secs
> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
> Throughput *546.65 MBps *time 3.9285 secs
root at fsnode2 ~ $ gluster volume top r2vol write-perf bs 4096 count 524288
> list-cnt 0
> Brick: fsnode2.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
> Throughput *539.60 MBps *time 3.9798 secs
> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
> Throughput *580.07 MBps *time 3.7021 secs
And two *pure replicated ('re...
2018 Apr 12
0
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...e 3.3989 secs
>> Brick: fsnode6.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
>> Throughput *566.96 MBps *time 3.7877 secs
>> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
>> Throughput *546.65 MBps *time 3.9285 secs
>
>
> root at fsnode2 ~ $ gluster volume top r2vol write-perf bs 4096 count 524288
>> list-cnt 0
>> Brick: fsnode2.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
>> Throughput *539.60 MBps *time 3.9798 secs
>> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
>> Throughput *580.07 MBps *time 3.7021 secs
>
>
>...
2018 Apr 13
1
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...rick: fsnode6.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
>>> Throughput *566.96 MBps *time 3.7877 secs
>>> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r3vol/brick1/brick
>>> Throughput *546.65 MBps *time 3.9285 secs
>>
>>
>> root at fsnode2 ~ $ gluster volume top r2vol write-perf bs 4096 count
>>> 524288 list-cnt 0
>>> Brick: fsnode2.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
>>> Throughput *539.60 MBps *time 3.9798 secs
>>> Brick: fsnode4.ibnet:/data/glusterfs/r2vol/brick1/brick
>>> Throughput *580.07 MBps *time 3.7021...