search for: r2spec

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated...

Is there somewhere a succinct guide to just how much extra crud we need to install on RHEL to make use of EPEL packages? [root at troll-1 noarch]# rpm -ivh R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: fedora-packager is needed by R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch [root at troll-1 noarch]# wget http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm [...] [root at troll-1 noarch]# rpm -ivh fedora-packager-0.5.9....

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 02:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jos?, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > > > > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab J...

Hi Jos?, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab Jason's preliminary R macr...

This is not specifically a CentOS question, but I am creating RPMS for CentOS 6 from some CRAN tarballs. I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has test or example programs that start with #!/usr/bin/r with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a dependency on /usr/bin/r, which can't be...

Dear list(s), Several people are actually really interested to package the CRAN or Bioconductor in RPM using R2spec. One of the features that R2spec should handle is the %file section of the spec file, to handle it I would like to be able to predict which files are installed while running the `R CMD INSTALL package_name` command from the tarball directly. I could always make R2spec compiling the spec files bu...

...> cannot find R-cran-ggplot2 or R-cran-caret. Does anyone know what > > packages in CentOS 7 I need for dplyr, doBy, and ggplot2? > > > > > They are not in the CentOS or epel distros. I have built both dplyr and > ggplot2 for CentOS 6 and 7, using the spec file crated by R2spec (from > epell) and rpmbuild. They both require building several other R packages, > and a bit of tweaking to the %files portion of the spec file, but are > doable. I've never tried doBy or caret. > Feel free to contact me directly for more information, Thanks for the reply. At lea...

I have a R script that I am running from python with rpy2. On a debian system I run this: apt-get install R-cran-ggplot2 R-cran-caret And the script works. I want to move this to CentOS 7 system. There it cannot find R-cran-ggplot2 or R-cran-caret. Does anyone know what packages in CentOS 7 I need for dplyr, doBy, and ggplot2?

Hi, I'm trying to get the 'xts' library from CRAN packaged for Fedora 12, and one of its dependencies is 'Hmisc'. I have created a spec file for that using R2spec, but building it fails with something in building the manual pages: Warning: ./man/escapeRegex.Rd:22: unknown macro '\backslash' [similar warnings snipped] Warning: newline within quoted string at rcspline.restate.Rd:21 Warning: ./man/rcspline.restate.Rd:80: unexpected section header '...

...ady have other examples of how to do this with less steps. :-) Create macros like %{r_sitearch} %{r_sitelib} that expand with the R version being used and place them in R-rpm-macros and change all the R srpms to use them. We can also contribute changes to srpm generators like https://pagure.io/r2spec. This is a one-time change. Then when a new R version shows up it is enough to bump the release and rebuild the package. With the added advantage that all the cobwebs and dust are cleaned. :-) Another advantage is that the boilerplate code required to create a srpm package decreases. :-) Reg...

...dora view of the world. I extract those in the troublesome subset up top in this email, and note the complete list of my packaging delendency tree after my signature Let me take a moment, by the way, and commend the fine work of Pierre-YvesChibon [pingou -at- fedoraproject -dot- org] and the R2spec package which he has devised and worked on. It made much of my effort possible. Thanks !! I also have adopted the 'tarball release flattening' approach recommended on the Fedora R mailing list earlier this month, and will probably make a run through the RawHide packagings shortly, fi...

On 6/5/2015 3:09 AM, Peter wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: >> I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it >> works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has >> test or example programs that start with >> >> #!/usr/bin/r >> >> with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up...

Am 03.06.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu>: > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > test or example programs that start with > > #!/usr/bin/r > > with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a > dependenc...

On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > test or example programs that start with > > #!/usr/bin/r > > with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a > dependenc...

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > > test or example programs that start with > > > > #!/usr/bin/r > > > > with lower case r, and the resulting package then wi...

On 06/05/2015 04:11 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 6/5/2015 3:09 AM, Peter wrote: >> On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: >>> I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it >>> works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has >>> test or example programs that start with >>> >>> #!/usr/bin/r >>> >>> with lower case r, and the resulti...

...to CentOS 7 system. There it > cannot find R-cran-ggplot2 or R-cran-caret. Does anyone know what > packages in CentOS 7 I need for dplyr, doBy, and ggplot2? > They are not in the CentOS or epel distros. I have built both dplyr and ggplot2 for CentOS 6 and 7, using the spec file crated by R2spec (from epell) and rpmbuild. They both require building several other R packages, and a bit of tweaking to the %files portion of the spec file, but are doable. I've never tried doBy or caret. Feel free to contact me directly for more information, Tony Schreiner

...t2 or R-cran-caret. Does anyone know what > > > packages in CentOS 7 I need for dplyr, doBy, and ggplot2? > > > > > > > > > They are not in the CentOS or epel distros. I have built both dplyr and > > ggplot2 for CentOS 6 and 7, using the spec file crated by R2spec (from > > epell) and rpmbuild. They both require building several other R packages, > > and a bit of tweaking to the %files portion of the spec file, but are > > doable. I've never tried doBy or caret. > > Feel free to contact me directly for more information, > >...

...s with less steps. :-) > > Create macros like > > %{r_sitearch} > %{r_sitelib} > > that expand with the R version being used and place them in R-rpm-macros and > change all the R srpms to use them. We can also contribute changes to srpm > generators like https://pagure.io/r2spec. > > This is a one-time change. > > Then when a new R version shows up it is enough to bump the release and > rebuild the package. With the added advantage that all the cobwebs and dust > are cleaned. :-) > > Another advantage is that the boilerplate code required to create...

...package builds then package them up. Most packages do work without customization, after all. If a package fails, I can always look into it later and customize the build for it, but I don't want to take the "boutique" approach implicit in existing packaging efforts for RPMs (such as R2spec). I admire what Dirk did with cran2deb and if I had a research assistant, I'd imitate that approach to make automatic RPMS for all R packages and customize steps for packages that fail. Did you ever use "checkinstall"? It is a way to 'cheat' while making RPM packages. If y...