search for: r2i

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "r2i".

Did you mean: l2i
2016 Mar 24
4
Centos in the Browser string ?
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 23:46 -0500, g wrote: > until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; > > User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ > or > User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1 > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-quick-switch/ > or > User...
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Re: Pluggable Register Coalescers
...viously extracted from the live intervals before joining. This makes things consistent so that repSrcReg is the register corresponding to the new SrcInt and ditto with repDstReg. [...] 00369 // If the intervals were swapped by Join, swap them back so that the register 00370 // mapping (in the r2i map) is correct. 00371 if (Swapped) SrcInt.swap(DstInt); Whoops! At this point repSrcReg is not consistent with SrcInt and the same goes for repDstReg! 00372 li_->removeInterval(repSrcReg); 00373 r2rMap_[repSrcReg] = repDstReg; Does this code get us into trouble due to the inconsistenc...
2007 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Re: Pluggable Register Coalescers
On Jul 17, 2007, at 9:28 AM, David Greene wrote: > > [...] > 00369 // If the intervals were swapped by Join, swap them back so > that the > register > 00370 // mapping (in the r2i map) is correct. > 00371 if (Swapped) SrcInt.swap(DstInt); > > Whoops! At this point repSrcReg is not consistent with SrcInt and the > same goes for repDstReg! > > 00372 li_->removeInterval(repSrcReg); > 00373 r2rMap_[repSrcReg] = repDstReg; > > Does this code g...
2016 Mar 23
2
Centos in the Browser string ?
I know Centos is a 100% rebuilt of whatever Red Hat has produced, even though the version numbers are no longer visually identical and, as Johnny always writes, "If it ain't in the Red Hat version, it ain't in Centos" or words having the same meaning. Having got circa 20,000 hits, from all round the world, to a single dull web page in 2 days, I thought I would analyse the
2016 Mar 24
0
Centos in the Browser string ?
...t; > > My questions are:- > > (1) Why can't we have 'Centos' in the Firefox browser string ? > > (2) Is 'X11' genuinely indicative of all 'real' Linux - both free and > commercial ? Android also calls itself Linux. > -- until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ or User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-quick-switch/ or User Agent Overrider 0.4.1 https://addons.m...
2016 Mar 24
0
Centos in the Browser string ?
On 03/23/2016 09:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 23:46 -0500, g wrote: > > >> until the devs get "r2i", you can use a firefox add-on; >> >> User-Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ >> or >> User Agent Quick Switch 0.5.2.1 >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-quick-s...
2012 May 02
0
PLS validation value
Greetings R users, My interest in the Q2cum score comes my endeavor to replicate SIMCAP PLS-DA analysis in R. I use the exact same dataset. After doing the analysis in R, I can get the exact same R2Ycum. However, the Q2cum is significantly off. Adding the Q2cum of the 1st and 2nd component comes close but that seems unconvincing and I don't understand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be
2012 May 10
0
PLS Q2 value?
Greetings R users, My interest in the Q2cum score comes my endeavor to replicate SIMCAP PLS-DA analysis in R.? I use the exact same dataset.? After doing the analysis in R, I can get the exact same R2Ycum.? However, the Q2cum is significantly off.? Adding the Q2cum of the 1st and 2nd component comes close but that seems unconvincing and I don't understand why the 3rd component Q2cum would be
2007 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Re: Pluggable Register Coalescers
On Jul 16, 2007, at 9:12 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2007 13:32, David A. Greene wrote: >> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 15:07, Christopher Lamb wrote: >>> Could it be possible for there to be a harness type interface that >>> would allow coalescers that support both modes to be hooked into the >>> pass registration, and those that depend on the
2007 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Re: Pluggable Register Coalescers
On Friday 13 July 2007 13:32, David A. Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 15:07, Christopher Lamb wrote: > > Could it be possible for there to be a harness type interface that > > would allow coalescers that support both modes to be hooked into the > > pass registration, and those that depend on the allocator not be > > registered as passes? > > I have a
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking