Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r283512".
Did you mean:
283512
2016 Nov 29
2
Loop Vectorize: Testing cost model driven transformations
...I when the
target is left unspecified. I was assuming it would default to whatever the
host is, but this doesn't seem to be the case. I guess this is a non-issue
after all, as long as we don't specify a triple in the target-independent
tests. And it looks like Michael cleaned that all up in r283512.
Thanks!
-- Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161129/d9864c9b/attachment.html>
2016 Nov 30
0
Loop Vectorize: Testing cost model driven transformations
...et is left unspecified. I was assuming it would default to whatever the
> host is, but this doesn't seem to be the case. I guess this is a non-issue
> after all, as long as we don't specify a triple in the target-independent
> tests. And it looks like Michael cleaned that all up in r283512.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scru...
2016 Nov 28
2
Loop Vectorize: Testing cost model driven transformations
Note: This is a continuation of a discussion over at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26869.
Hi all,
In a discussion over on llvm-commits, we are debating how best to test loop
vectorization transformations that are guided by the cost model. The cost
model is currently used primarily for determining the vectorization and
interleave factors. Both of these parameters are easily overridden with
command