Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "r277008".
2016 Jul 31
4
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
> The only thing a monorepo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without
> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
> my opinion, not a fact.
Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
something that a top-level git repo with submodules would allow...
2016 Jul 31
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...he only thing a monorepo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without
>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>> my opinion, not a fact.
>
> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
> something that a top-level git repo with su...
2016 Jul 31
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...The only thing a monorepo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without
>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>> my opinion, not a fact.
>
> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
> something that a top-level git repo with su...
2016 Jul 31
1
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...orepo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without
>>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>>> my opinion, not a fact.
>>
>> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
>> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
>> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
>> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
>> something that a top-level...
2016 Jul 31
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...repo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without
>>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>>> my opinion, not a fact.
>>
>> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
>> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
>> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
>> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
>> something that a top-level...
2016 Jul 31
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...le without
>>>>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>>>>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>>>>> my opinion, not a fact.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
>>>> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
>>>> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
>>>> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it
>>>...
2016 Aug 01
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...gt;>>> it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit.
>>>>>> Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is
>>>>>> my opinion, not a fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and
>>>>> clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number.
>>>>> I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of
>>>>> how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it...
2016 Jul 28
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote:
>
>>> The decision of whether or not to include these projects
>>> affects only read-write consumers of these projects -- of which there
>>> are relatively few people.
>>
>> Maybe there are few, but the impact is non-insignificant. Also I think the opinions of the
2016 Jul 26
56
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
Hi Duncan,
> […]
> 2. Those working on projects *outside* the monolithic repo will get the downsides of both: a monolithic repo that they are only using parts of, and multiple repos that are somehow version-locked.
>
> 3. For many (most?) developers, changing to a monolithic git repo is a *bigger* workflow change than switching to separate git repos. Many people (and at least some