Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r271095".
Did you mean:
r270959
2016 May 28
2
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942
Done. r271095
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Reproduced, should be easy to fix. Will do it.
> And thanks for noticing, on my machine this fails very fast and the test
> passes because it sees everything it wants to see.
>
> --kcc
>
> O...
2016 May 28
0
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942
On 27 May 2016 at 21:26, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Done. r271095
Thanks that fixed the issue for me. But now ``fuzzer.test`` is failing
for me. Specifically
```
not LLVMFuzzer-NullDerefTest -close_fd_mask=3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=NullDerefTest
```
However it looks like this is to be expected because this test is
relying on the symbol ``__s...
2016 May 28
0
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942
Reproduced, should be easy to fix. Will do it.
And thanks for noticing, on my machine this fails very fast and the test
passes because it sees everything it wants to see.
--kcc
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This started as an off hand comment in [1] but this appears to be a
> real issue so I'm moving the discussion to the
2016 May 28
2
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942
Hi,
This started as an off hand comment in [1] but this appears to be a
real issue so I'm moving the discussion to the mailing list.
In r270942 the time taken to run LibFuzzer's test became noticeably
longer. I am building on
* Arch Linux (4.5.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 11 22:21:28 CEST
2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
* I am building libFuzzer and running its tests like so
```