search for: r269144

...of tree targets will need to be updated to replace the argument node and remove any dead nodes in cases where they currently return an SDNode * from this interface. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html You can look at the changes to the various in-tree targets between r268693 and r270454 (e.g., r269144 for x86). -Ahmed > > > MartinO > > > > From: Martin J. O'Riordan [mailto:martin.oriordan at movidius.com] > Sent: 28 June 2016 16:49 > To: 'LLVM Developers' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Question about changes to 'Selection...

It occurred to me that instead of the various breakout 'Select*' functions returning the 'SDNode*' result, maybe I should be calling: ReplaceNode(N, newValue); return; or: SelectCode(N); return; Perhaps? MartinO From: Martin J. O'Riordan [mailto:martin.oriordan at movidius.com] Sent: 28 June 2016 16:49 To: 'LLVM Developers'

...of tree targets will need to be updated to replace the argument node and remove any dead nodes in cases where they currently return an SDNode * from this interface. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html You can look at the changes to the various in-tree targets between r268693 and r270454 (e.g., r269144 for x86). -Ahmed > > > MartinO > > > > From: Martin J. O'Riordan [mailto:martin.oriordan at movidius.com] > Sent: 28 June 2016 16:49 > To: 'LLVM Developers' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Question about changes to 'Selection...

...ed to be updated to replace the argument node and remove any dead nodes in cases where they currently return an SDNode * from this interface. > > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > You can look at the changes to the various in-tree targets between > r268693 and r270454 (e.g., r269144 for x86). > > -Ahmed > >> >> >> MartinO >> >> >> >> From: Martin J. O'Riordan [mailto:martin.oriordan at movidius.com] >> Sent: 28 June 2016 16:49 >> To: 'LLVM Developers' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >&...