search for: r267335

On 05/11/2016 05:16 PM, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev wrote: > > After applying the patch on r267335 and bootstrap LLVM/clang with > cfl-aa enabled on its own as well as behind basic-aa on an x86 > machine, I ran test-suite with lit and saw no failed test cases > > Woohoo! This is great news. :D Awesome! > > I'm not sure how closely everyone is reading the intro emails, so...

...ragmented and incremental, I felt that as long as the work is useful to the community, it is going to be the most valuable summer I've ever had as a student. ** Current Status ** I've submitted a simple patch last week (D19776) to fix a subtle bug in cfl-aa. After applying the patch on r267335 and bootstrap LLVM/clang with cfl-aa enabled on its own as well as behind basic-aa on an x86 machine, I ran test-suite with lit and saw no failed test cases. I didn't time the tests in any rigorous way, but it didn't look like cfl-aa add very noticable performance overhead. It may be a...

...hat's the magic rune to enable cfl-aa? > > James > > On Thu, 12 May 2016 at 05:58 Philip Reames via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 05/11/2016 05:16 PM, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> > After applying the patch on r267335 and bootstrap LLVM/clang with >> cfl-aa enabled on its own as well as behind basic-aa on an x86 machine, I >> ran test-suite with lit and saw no failed test cases >> >> Woohoo! This is great news. :D >> >> Awesome! >> >> >> I'm not sure how...