Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r265673".
Did you mean:
26573
2016 Jun 22
2
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section.
.... Probably the
> name given to it ("thunk") is too generic -- maybe we should rename it
> MipsLA25Thunk or something like that. I think you want to create a new type
> of thunk for ARM.
>
> The bug that we sometimes create broken MIPS thunks seems to have introduced
> in r265673 which Rafael made. Before that patch, we didn't assume that
> section VAs are available in scanRelocs. I think we want to revert that
> change (although it cannot simply be reverted because the patch was
> submitted in April, and many changes has been made on it since then.)
>
>...
2016 Jun 21
2
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section.
I've been working on supporting ARM/Thumb interworking thunks in LLD
and have encountered a limitation that I think it is worth bringing up
in a wider context. This is all LLD specific, apologies if I've abused
llvm-dev here.
TL;DR summary:
- Thunks in lld may not work if they are added to InputSections that
have already been scanned.
- There is a short term fix, but in the longer term I