Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "r263521".
Did you mean:
26352
2016 Mar 22
6
Need help with code generation
...cious input and they operate in a far hostile environment with many more input formats than we do.
It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
(r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
acknowledge yet.
> I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features that you choose to put your time into, but I am interested in project policy.
Why do you care about policy that is not followed? A policy...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
Hi Rafael,
One week ago I pointed out that your patch (r263521) introduces a crash. It
> still hasn't been reverted or even
> acknowledge yet.
My apologies - your reply slipped through my filters, but that should
absolutely be fixed. I've responded to your mail and will have a fix for
this shortly.
- Lang.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Raf...
2016 Mar 22
3
Need help with code generation
...any more input formats than we do.
>
> > It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>
> > Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>
> > Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>
> > (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>
> > acknowledge yet.
>
> > > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
> > > features that you choose to put your time into, but I am
> > > interested in project policy....
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...in a far hostile
> environment with many more input formats than we do.
>
> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
> acknowledge yet.
>
>
> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features
> that you choose to put your time into, but I am interested in project
> policy.
>
> Why do you care about...
2016 Mar 22
4
Need help with code generation
...any more input formats than we do.
>>>
>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features
>>> that you choose to put your time into, but I am interested in project
>&...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...; environment with many more input formats than we do.
>>
>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>> acknowledge yet.
>>
>>
>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features
>> that you choose to put your time into, but I am interested in project
>> policy.
>>...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...ts than we do.
>>>>
>>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features
>>>> that you choose to put your time into, but I am interes...
2016 Mar 22
2
Need help with code generation
...gt;>>>
>>>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
>>>>> features that you choose to put your time in...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...make them more
> > > > > secure.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> > > > > Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your
> > > > > patch
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> > > > > (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted
> > > > > or
> > > > > even
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> > > > > acknowledge yet.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> > > > > > I'...
2016 Mar 22
4
Need help with code generation
...>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
>>>>>>> feat...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...>>>>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
>>>>>> features that you choose...
2016 Mar 22
3
Need help with code generation
...ts than we do.
>>>>
>>>> It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the features
>>>> that you choose to put your time into, but I am interes...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...> > your
> > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> > > > > > > > > (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been
> > > > > > > > > reverted
> > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > even
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
>>>>&...
2016 Mar 23
3
Need help with code generation
...tant to note how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or even
>>>>>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > I'm not trying to shift your personal goal, or to direct the
&...
2016 Mar 23
0
Need help with code generation
...how different they are. Both Firefox and
>>>>>>>>>> Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure.
>>>>>>>>>> Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch
>>>>>>>>>> (r263521) introduces a crash. It still hasn't been reverted or
>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > I'm n...
2016 Mar 22
4
Need help with code generation
>>
>> * I don't want to trade my time implementing stuff users will see
(linker script, debug index, speed) for things users will not.
>
>
> Don't you think that you are somehow trading your time for other people's
time when they'll have to build other features on top of the codebase?
> I understand you're putting the cursor toward end-users facing