search for: r263214

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r263214".

Did you mean: 23214
2016 Mar 16
2
LLD performance w.r.t. local symbols (and --build-id)
Hi, Rafael took some measurements to try to investigate the effect of the local symbols changes. I've been taking a look at the measurements he got and there were some interesting things we noticed. For starters, in the range of revisions tested (r263214 through r263471), we found that the commit for --build-id was the most noticeable, with slowdowns from 7% to 23% (note: these were non-debug builds). This is somewhat concerning because it appears that this option is passed to the linker by default on Linux. Any performance comparisons with other...
2016 Mar 16
2
LLD performance w.r.t. local symbols (and --build-id)
...mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, Rafael took some measurements to try to investigate the effect of the local symbols changes. I've been taking a look at the measurements he got and there were some interesting things we noticed. For starters, in the range of revisions tested (r263214 through r263471), we found that the commit for --build-id was the most noticeable, with slowdowns from 7% to 23% (note: these were non-debug builds). This is somewhat concerning because it appears that this option is passed to the linker by default on Linux. Any performance comparisons with other...