search for: r261887

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r261887".

Did you mean: r261387
2016 Feb 25
2
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
...good idea. I’ll take a look at this later today. > > Here is a patch that adds the field names. > > Thanks, > -Brad > > <0001-Populate-field-names-on-builtin-struct-underlying-__.patch> I’m really sorry I totally forgot about this! Thanks for the patch. Committed as r261887
2016 Feb 25
0
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
On 02/25/2016 11:41 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: > Thanks for the patch. Committed as r261887 Great, thanks! -Brad
2016 Feb 25
0
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
On 02/19/2016 10:35 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King wrote: >> [snip] >>> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed. >> To clarify, this is not so much about the appearance of new builtins >> but that the structure has fields with no name. Other builtin >> structures like __va_list_tag have names on their
2016 Feb 19
2
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote: > > On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Michka Popoff wrote: >> Our problem is that the AST contains some declarations which were not there before. > [snip] >> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed. > [snip] >> Maybe someone could enlighten us about this change. >>