Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r261887".
Did you mean:
r261387
2016 Feb 25
2
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
...good idea. I’ll take a look at this later today.
>
> Here is a patch that adds the field names.
>
> Thanks,
> -Brad
>
> <0001-Populate-field-names-on-builtin-struct-underlying-__.patch>
I’m really sorry I totally forgot about this! Thanks for the patch. Committed as r261887
2016 Feb 25
0
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
On 02/25/2016 11:41 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. Committed as r261887
Great, thanks!
-Brad
2016 Feb 25
0
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
On 02/19/2016 10:35 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed.
>> To clarify, this is not so much about the appearance of new builtins
>> but that the structure has fields with no name. Other builtin
>> structures like __va_list_tag have names on their
2016 Feb 19
2
Question about __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Michka Popoff wrote:
>> Our problem is that the AST contains some declarations which were not there before.
> [snip]
>> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed.
> [snip]
>> Maybe someone could enlighten us about this change.
>>