Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r255902".
Did you mean:
255902
2016 Feb 10
2
[RFC] Lanai backend
...5K, so widespread availability isn’t really a relevant criteria for accepting that.
And SystemZ is hopefully a good comparison in that is a new and well
isolated backend. Ever since it went in I can remember only ever
discussing 1 or 2 patches, and the last case pushed me to improving
common code (r255902).
Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai
being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of
experimental when there is desire for that?
Cheers,
Rafael
2016 Feb 10
9
[RFC] Lanai backend
You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty
strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad
that you've surfaced it where we can clearly look at the issue.
The idea of "it really should have users outside of just the people who
have access to the HW" I think is deeply problematic for the project as a
whole. Where does