search for: r252380

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r252380".

Did you mean: 225280
2016 Feb 10
2
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...gt; From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:51 PM > To: Duncan P. N. Exon Smith > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since >> >> You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt: >> >> Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert >> this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites. >> Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may >> happen to &quot...
2016 Feb 10
5
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...ely, but I'm not quite there yet. > > Since this change is annotated as NFC, I’m thinking that the actual cause of my error is some other (earlier) change to the way ArgumentListType is derived, but I haven’t found it yet, so I thought I’d bug you first. You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt: Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites. Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may happen to "work" now, but only because of gett...
2016 Feb 10
3
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...apple.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:51 PM >>> To: Duncan P. N. Exon Smith >>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since >> >> >>>> >>>> You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt: >>>> >>>> Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert >>>> this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites. >>>> Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may &...