Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r252380".
Did you mean:
225280
2016 Feb 10
2
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...gt; From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:51 PM
> To: Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
>>
>> You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt:
>>
>> Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert
>> this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites.
>> Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may
>> happen to "...
2016 Feb 10
5
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...ely, but I'm not quite there yet.
>
> Since this change is annotated as NFC, I’m thinking that the actual cause of my error is some other (earlier) change to the way ArgumentListType is derived, but I haven’t found it yet, so I thought I’d bug you first.
You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt:
Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert
this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites.
Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may
happen to "work" now, but only because of gett...
2016 Feb 10
3
Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
...apple.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:51 PM
>>> To: Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
>>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Question about an error we're now starting to get on LLVM 3.8.0rc2since
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> You're looking for r252380. Relevant excerpt:
>>>>
>>>> Note: if you have out-of-tree code, it should be fairly easy to revert
>>>> this patch downstream while you update your out-of-tree call sites.
>>>> Note that these conversions are occasionally latent bugs (that may
&...