Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r250852".
2015 Oct 21
3
ilist/iplist are broken (maybe I'll fix them?)
...) downcasts on `operator++()`, so maybe it's not a
> big deal. It's certainly more convenient to eschew type safety. I'm
> willing to let these bitrot back if that's better.
>
> Now that I've rooted out the bugs I was looking for (confirmed LLVM
> is clean as of r250852) I'll get back to fixing `getNextNode()` and
> ilist itself.
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2015-Oct-07, at 17:57, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at ap...
2015 Oct 20
2
ilist/iplist are broken (maybe I'll fix them?)
I think the implicit iterator conversions are much less important now that
we have range based for loops, but I still like having them.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2015-Oct-07, at 17:57, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've been