Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r238504".
2015 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
...ustinbogner.com> wrote:
> It sounds to me like this documentation just needs some clean up to be
> clearer up front about what's going on. If nobody else gets to it first,
> I'll take a shot at improving the situation when I have a chance.
I just reworked this section a bit in r238504. Dario, does this help?
Justin, could you check me for consistency?
Thanks. Diego.
2015 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
...:
>
>> It sounds to me like this documentation just needs some clean up to be
>> clearer up front about what's going on. If nobody else gets to it first,
>> I'll take a shot at improving the situation when I have a chance.
>
> I just reworked this section a bit in r238504. Dario, does this help?
>
> Justin, could you check me for consistency?
Looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
2015 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
Dario Domizioli <dario.domizioli at gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Diego,
>
> thanks for clarifying the difference between the two formats. I have noticed
> the new note in the "Sample Profile Format" section of the Clang guide
> clarifying that it is different from the coverage format.
>
> So, my further question is... Am I right in understanding that both formats
2015 May 28
3
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
Hi Diego,
thanks for clarifying the difference between the two formats. I have
noticed the new note in the "Sample Profile Format" section of the Clang
guide clarifying that it is different from the coverage format.
So, my further question is... Am I right in understanding that both formats
can be used for PGO purposes then?
I have tried the following, as in the Clang user guide:
$