search for: r238504

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r238504".

2015 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
...ustinbogner.com> wrote: > It sounds to me like this documentation just needs some clean up to be > clearer up front about what's going on. If nobody else gets to it first, > I'll take a shot at improving the situation when I have a chance. I just reworked this section a bit in r238504. Dario, does this help? Justin, could you check me for consistency? Thanks. Diego.
2015 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
...: > >> It sounds to me like this documentation just needs some clean up to be >> clearer up front about what's going on. If nobody else gets to it first, >> I'll take a shot at improving the situation when I have a chance. > > I just reworked this section a bit in r238504. Dario, does this help? > > Justin, could you check me for consistency? Looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
2015 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
Dario Domizioli <dario.domizioli at gmail.com> writes: > Hi Diego, > > thanks for clarifying the difference between the two formats. I have noticed > the new note in the "Sample Profile Format" section of the Clang guide > clarifying that it is different from the coverage format. > > So, my further question is... Am I right in understanding that both formats
2015 May 28
3
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
Hi Diego, thanks for clarifying the difference between the two formats. I have noticed the new note in the "Sample Profile Format" section of the Clang guide clarifying that it is different from the coverage format. So, my further question is... Am I right in understanding that both formats can be used for PGO purposes then? I have tried the following, as in the Clang user guide: $