search for: r233819

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r233819".

Did you mean: r233817
2015 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963?
...apply your to my local copy of LLVM 3.6 and see how it goes. Cheers, Alan. From: Reid Kleckner [mailto:rnk at google.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 18:56 To: Alan Garny Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963? Thanks for the poke. I fixed the issue in r233819. It'll be in the next point release. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Alan Garny <agarny at hellix.com> wrote: Hi, I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I should have waited for version 3.6.1… With JIT having been officially superseded by MCJ...
2015 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963?
Hi, I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I should have waited for version 3.6.1. With JIT having been officially superseded by MCJIT, I updated my code and got everything working fine on 64-bit Windows, 32-bit/64-bit Linux and OS X, but it's not working properly on 32-bit Windows. Basically, the issue I am having is similar to the one reported in