Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r233819".
Did you mean:
r233817
2015 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963?
...apply your to my local copy of LLVM 3.6 and see how it goes.
Cheers, Alan.
From: Reid Kleckner [mailto:rnk at google.com]
Sent: 01 April 2015 18:56
To: Alan Garny
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963?
Thanks for the poke. I fixed the issue in r233819. It'll be in the next point release.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Alan Garny <agarny at hellix.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I should have waited for version 3.6.1… With JIT having been officially superseded by MCJ...
2015 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963?
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I
should have waited for version 3.6.1. With JIT having been officially
superseded by MCJIT, I updated my code and got everything working fine on
64-bit Windows, 32-bit/64-bit Linux and OS X, but it's not working properly
on 32-bit Windows.
Basically, the issue I am having is similar to the one reported in