Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r229502".
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
...recognize __has_feature, so this
>> is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it
>> should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for
>> quite a while now.
I think we're safe to use it. I've made an experimental commit in
r229502 to see if any of the bots complain, and will revert if they
do. Otherwise, I think we're good to go.
~Aaron
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
__has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this
is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this