search for: r229502

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r229502".

2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
...recognize __has_feature, so this >> is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it >> should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for >> quite a while now. I think we're safe to use it. I've made an experimental commit in r229502 to see if any of the bots complain, and will revert if they do. Otherwise, I think we're good to go. ~Aaron
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER) Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that? The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this