Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r218078".
Did you mean:
rl218078
2015 Jun 03
4
[LLVMdev] Updated RFC: ThinLTO Implementation Plan
...bitcode as bitcode. And the
LTOModule::createFrom*/lto_module_create* routines correctly parse the
native object-wrapped bitcode and return an LTOmodule.
As a result, the llvm-lto tool that also uses libLTO interfaces didn't
require any changes when the native-wrapped reading support went in
(r218078), and is able to handle native-wrapped bitcode out of the
box.
>
> Handling the function index/summary behind an API sounds like a good idea.
I am going to work on fleshing out this part next so that the actual
format of the files is hidden from clients.
Thanks,
Teresa
>
> On Fri, M...
2015 May 29
4
[LLVMdev] Updated RFC: ThinLTO Implementation Plan
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote:
> My earlier statement about wrapping things in a native object file held in that it is controversial. It appears to be still central to your design.
>
> It may help to look at the problem from a different viewpoint: LLVM is not a compiler. It is a framework that can be used to make compiler-like tools.