Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r199769".
Did you mean:
199769
2014 Jan 20
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4 stable releases
On 20 January 2014 16:34, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> I'm much more concerned about platform testing and validation than I am
> the binaries.
>
That's a good point. Distributions should trust our source branches because
we tested on the release platforms, not because our binary releases are out.
As far as I understand, there only two "supported"
2014 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4 stable releases
...> wrote:
> There are three commits I've made to Clang that I'd like to see in the 3.4
> release branch if for no other reason than to help out folks bootstrapping
> on old Linux distributions with too-old installed versions of
> GCC/libstdc++. These are r199632, r199633, and r199769. Let me know if you
> can merge them or I should or how we can get a nice stable tree that folks
> can check out and build as the first step of getting a bootstrap.
>
Hi Chandler,
We haven't set a fixed date or anything, but if I got it right, those three
patches are independent from...