search for: r187902

On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > One exception we have in the coding standard is that classes that look > like STL ones should use similar names for the methods (begin(), > push_back(), etc...). > > But different parts of llvm have different opinions on how to handle > the related case of classes that are not STL like,

One exception we have in the coding standard is that classes that look like STL ones should use similar names for the methods (begin(), push_back(), etc...). But different parts of llvm have different opinions on how to handle the related case of classes that are not STL like, but have multiple collections that can be iterated over. * llvm/IR uses global_begin, alias_begin, etc. I.E., singular