search for: r184083

...e efficiently (i.e. only call Linker::LinkModules() on the relevant bitcode modules inside the bitcode archive). Before I started I thought I'd better check that this API was still going to be available in the upcoming 3.4 release and to my dismay ``llvm/Bitcode/Archive.h`` was moved by you in r184083 and finally removed by you in r186197. So... * Is LLVM completely moving away from the idea have bitcode archive runtime libraries? The LLVM Make build system seems to support building these but LLVM doesn't seem to have an API for linking runtime bitcode archives into a bitcode module any mo...

...call Linker::LinkModules() on the > relevant bitcode modules inside the bitcode archive). > > Before I started I thought I'd better check that this API was still > going to be available in the upcoming 3.4 release and to my dismay > ``llvm/Bitcode/Archive.h`` was moved by you in r184083 and finally > removed by you in r186197. > > So... > > * Is LLVM completely moving away from the idea have bitcode archive > runtime libraries? The LLVM Make build system seems to support > building these but LLVM doesn't seem to have an API for linking > runtime bitcode...

...ules() on the >> relevant bitcode modules inside the bitcode archive). >> >> Before I started I thought I'd better check that this API was still >> going to be available in the upcoming 3.4 release and to my dismay >> ``llvm/Bitcode/Archive.h`` was moved by you in r184083 and finally >> removed by you in r186197. >> >> So... >> >> * Is LLVM completely moving away from the idea have bitcode archive >> runtime libraries? The LLVM Make build system seems to support >> building these but LLVM doesn't seem to have an API fo...