Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "r182853".
2013 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in
glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail. What
version of libc are you using?
(Repeating - my previous message got stuck in the moderation queue because
the quoted text was too long.)
-------------- nex...
2013 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>wrote:
> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in
> glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail. What
> version of libc are you using?
>
> (Repeating - my previous message got stuck in the moderation queue because
> the quoted text was too l...
2013 May 31
3
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...x.
>
> Greg
>
> On May 31, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com> wrote:
>
> I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>wrote:
>
>> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in
>> glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail. What
>> version of libc are you using?
>>
>> (Repeating - my previous message got stuck in the moderation queue
>> because the q...
2013 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...3, at 2:37 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in
>>> glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail. What
>>> version of libc are you using?
>>>
>>> (Repeating - my previous message got stuck in the moderation queue
>&g...
2013 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in
> >>> glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail.
> What
> >>> version of libc are you using?
> >>>
> >>> (Repeating - my previous message got stuck in th...
2013 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...est failures on x86 Linux.
Greg
On May 31, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com> wrote:
> I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com> wrote:
>> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor in glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail. What version of libc are you using?
>>
>> (Repeating - my previous message got stuck in the moderation queue because the quoted text was too long.)...
2013 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...> >>
>> >> I'm confused - do those test failures happen on x86 Android?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> r182853 introduced an assumption about the size of thread descriptor
>> >>> in
>> >>> glibc. On your system it's 48 bytes off, which is why the tests fail.
>> >>> What
>> >>> version of libc are you using?
>> >>>
>> >&g...
2013 May 30
5
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
...re moved to clang. compiler-rt is just a C
library and its functions can be tested in isolation.
> our bots seem to be green. Could you refer to guilty svn revision?
Hmm, I just did another clean build, just to be sure. I
consistently have see 14 failures (tests and logs below). I believe
r182853 broke the SanitizerCommon tests and r182854 broke the asan
tests, but I'm not 100% certain and unfortunately don't have time to
dive into this one. Would you mind taking a quick scan of the logs
below and letting me know if anything stands out to you.
Failing Tests (14):
AddressSaniti...
2013 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
> The sanitizer common and asan that mention 'thread' are failing for me
> this morning. How are your bots looking? Last good commit here was
> 512c616cacf70ca029a2bf719a482b902f3687cd.
>
Hm, our bots seem to be green. Could you refer to guilty svn revision?
>
> > You could try
2013 May 30
2
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?
The sanitizer common and asan that mention 'thread' are failing for me
this morning. How are your bots looking? Last good commit here was
512c616cacf70ca029a2bf719a482b902f3687cd.
> You could try preprocessing your report with perl or sed to fix paths
> to your binaries. It would be great to have an option for that in
> asan_symbolize.py.
>
> As for addr2line, we just