Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r182559".
2013 Jun 06
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
...$ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
RPATH
$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand.
Maybe we should merge r182559 to the release branch? Or at least we
should take care not to build it in a /home directory.
- Hans
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup
> performance o...
2013 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
...rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
> RPATH
> $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
>
> This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand.
>
> Maybe we should merge r182559 to the release branch? Or at least we
> should take care not to build it in a /home directory.
>
We won't be merging any more patches into the branch. We're basically done with it now. We just need to create the final binaries.
The regression isn't expected, of course. I hope it...
2013 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
...> RPATH
> > RPATH
> >
> $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
> >
> > This will slow things down if the system tries to automount
> /home/aadgrand.
> >
> > Maybe we should merge r182559 to the release branch? Or at least we
> > should take care not to build it in a /home directory.
> >
> We won't be merging any more patches into the branch. We're basically done
> with it now. We just need to create the final binaries.
>
> The regression isn't ex...
2013 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi Bill,
I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup
performance of your binaries is much worse than the stable binaries
for 3.2
I've used:
http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/clang+llvm-3.2-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-12.04.tar.gz
vs
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3/clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64.tar.gz
On a simple hello.c file:
/ssd/bench$ TIMEFORMAT="%E"
2013 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi LLVM-ites!
We are doing a quick test of 3.3rc3. Our testers did a quick turn around and created binaries which you can test. Please give them a go and let us know how they work for you. They are here:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3
We don't have a lot of time remaining in the release cycle, so please do whatever you can to make sure they are solid. In particular, make sure that