Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r181639".
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Bitcode abbreviations for something that's not a record
...rts otherwise).
I don't know if this is expected (but not documented) or not. The
documentation, to me, reads like it doesn't disallow it, but we might be
assuming all abreviations start with a full record, which would make the
first operand never be an array or a blob.
The bug comes from r181639 (
http://llvm.org/klaus/llvm/commit/1197e38f3338b8db76f0fa38c2687c65b2bcea5c/),
which took the code to read the first argument and put it outside of the
loop, but didn't take the Array/Blob verification + reading code too (It's
a bug because that commit was supposed to not have changed func...
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Bitcode abbreviations for something that's not a record
...expected (but not documented) or not. The
>> documentation, to me, reads like it doesn't disallow it, but we might be
>> assuming all abreviations start with a full record, which would make the
>> first operand never be an array or a blob.
>>
>> The bug comes from r181639 (
>> http://llvm.org/klaus/llvm/commit/1197e38f3338b8db76f0fa38c2687c65b2bcea5c/),
>> which took the code to read the first argument and put it outside of the
>> loop, but didn't take the Array/Blob verification + reading code too (It's
>> a bug because that commit w...