search for: r181639

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r181639".

2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Bitcode abbreviations for something that's not a record
...rts otherwise). I don't know if this is expected (but not documented) or not. The documentation, to me, reads like it doesn't disallow it, but we might be assuming all abreviations start with a full record, which would make the first operand never be an array or a blob. The bug comes from r181639 ( http://llvm.org/klaus/llvm/commit/1197e38f3338b8db76f0fa38c2687c65b2bcea5c/), which took the code to read the first argument and put it outside of the loop, but didn't take the Array/Blob verification + reading code too (It's a bug because that commit was supposed to not have changed func...
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Bitcode abbreviations for something that's not a record
...expected (but not documented) or not. The >> documentation, to me, reads like it doesn't disallow it, but we might be >> assuming all abreviations start with a full record, which would make the >> first operand never be an array or a blob. >> >> The bug comes from r181639 ( >> http://llvm.org/klaus/llvm/commit/1197e38f3338b8db76f0fa38c2687c65b2bcea5c/), >> which took the code to read the first argument and put it outside of the >> loop, but didn't take the Array/Blob verification + reading code too (It's >> a bug because that commit w...